In this issue:
Departments:
|
by Scott Gill A group of high school biology teachers are discussing which publisher they should choose for the text book. George wants the book by W.C. Brown, Chris wants the D.C. Heath book, and Alice is satisfied with the BSCS blue version they presently use. Each is adamant about their choice. The district curriculum director wants the middle school math teachers to allow a greater percentage of students to take algebra in the 8th grade. The district believes that approximately 25% of all 8th grade students should be successful in algebra. The math teachers claim that approximately 18% is a more realistic number. The math teachers are considering going to the superintendent with their argument. The first grade teachers have been going to staff development to improve reading instruction. One group has received information on direct instruction and believe it is the answer to the reading instructional problems they have experienced. Another group believes that whole language is the answer and that direct instruction is inadequate in teaching reading comprehension. Yet a third group has just returned from a conference called guided reading and they are enthused about this method of reading instruction. It becomes obvious that the first grade teachers are separating themselves in three distinct camps or groups. Most often in teaching these are the types of issues that teachers identify with and become the issues causing teachers to take a stand and "fight" for their opinion. The high school teachers are arguing over the text selection - not the instructional methods, not the inclusion of special needs students, not the classroom climate or student expectations. The middle school teachers will tell you that their 8th graders are not ready for algebra, that the students are not capable of learning algebraic concepts at that age. The fact that in most other countries algebra is taught in the sixth and seventh grades is not mentioned. And the elementary teachers miss the point that all three methods of reading instruction have value and worth. Indeed, within the same classroom, depending on the ability of the students, there may be students that could benefit from each of the methods. Reading the Fullan and Hargreaves book, "What's Worth Fighting For In Your School, has given me the opportunity to stop and reflect on the essentials in education that I personally believe are worth the battle. I am reminded that Steven Covey, in his book on "Principle-Centered Leadership", mentions that too often we are taught skills without knowing the principles upon which the skills are based. With limited knowledge and understanding we then believe that the skills are the solution to the problems. Yet, when the circumstances change and we are faced with a solution for which we have not practiced or have been given skills to address, we are at a loss. If we understand the principles shaping the skills, then regardless of the circumstances we have the principles to inform the action. Expeditionary Learning, a New American Schools model for high performing schools, is based on ten design principles. If our practices were based on these ten design principles (many educational programs have similar principles) then questions about what text, the ability of students to succeed with rigorous work, or instructional methods would become less of an issue. No matter the text, if teaching was based on these principles, students would succeed. In classrooms based on these design principles students would feel the support and security to attempt academic rigor. In a first grade classroom, teachers would understand the need to individualize instructional methods to meet the developmental needs of each child. The ten design principles of Expeditionary Learning include:
What is worth fighting for in your school? If our schools were based upon these design principles, or ones similar to these, then questions about text, student ability to learn, and instructional methods would become secondary to the creation of the climate and culture for learning. Rote memorization of facts and figures may allow a student to score well on the multiple choice question - but would not nurture the type of student prepared to live in the twenty first century. Schools that come together and garner agreement on a mission or vision based on principles like these can get on with the business of school improvement because they would have something from which all their decisions could be based or grounded. As new situations and circumstances arise, there are guiding principles that will inform the decisions and actions. Schools, classrooms, and instruction based on these principles are worth fighting for! Scott Gill is a Regional Director with Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound. The central US office is located at 1090 Alta Vista, Dubuque, Iowa 52001. The phone number is 319-588-8473. The e-mail address is sgill@pcii.net . |