Inspired by
the recent Chicago Bike Plan 2010 meeting, I set our on an exploratory
investigation of the route signing on the East-West Link, between the south
end of the North Branch Bicycle Train of the Forest Preserve District and
the Lakefront Path of the Chicago Park District. A native Chicagoan
would find it difficult to negotiate this link, let alone a traveler or
bicycle tourist who might traverse our fine city. There are
many turns in the short section I surveyed, which is listed as a “Recommended
Bike Route” on the 2001 Chicago Bike Map.
In email exchanges, several cyclists going cross-country have looked
for ways around the urban area. Instead, I encourage them to go right
through the urban area because of the bike-friendliness.
This investigation and report is free, unauthorized and unsolicited.
Maybe unappreciated too. I only traveled about half the distance
of the link: from the south end of the North Branch Trail to Pulaski Avenue.
The major complaint is the lack of signs or obscured signs.


|
I started out at the south end of the North Branch Bike
Trail, at the corner of Devon and Caldwell. Right at the trailhead,
there's a Forest Preserve sign indicating the path length and direction
going north into the forest preserve. But couldn't a sign be erected
that shows and map and gives directions for those headed east to the lakefront,
or who want to go south along the lakefront? I'm aware that this
is the boundry between multi-governmental units, the Forest Preserve District,
the Chicago Park District, and the City of Chicago, but I don't think asking
a little intergovernmental cooperation would be too much. |
|
The first sign encountered is on the south side of Devon,
after crossing Caldwell, eastbound. However, this sign can't be seen
easily if you're standing at the exit area of the North Branch Trail. |
|
The next sign, at the corner of Devon and Spokane, clearly
indicates the direction of travel. |

|
One block south of Devon is Leoti, and at this corner
of Leoti and Spokane there is no sign at this critical junction.
You’re supposed to turn left, or east. Indeed, as I was taking these
pictures, three bicyclists sped past me and continued south on Spokane.
If you miss this turn, you’ll wind up on Caldwell, a very heavily trafficked
street. . |
|
The route continues east on Leoti for just short of ½-mile
before you turn again. Given this distance it would seem like a good
idea to include a “confidence” sign, a sign simply pointing straight ahead
to let the cyclist know they are going in the right direction, they haven’t
missed a turn somewhere. |
|
At Leader and Leoti, a right turn is needed, and again
no sign. While taking these pictures, two cyclists passed and did
turn right but another two cyclists continued east for another block on
Leoti, stopped, and then turned right on the next street. |

|
Proceeding south on Leader, it’s one block to Caldwell.
There is a sign on the south side of Caldwell, along Leader, indicating
the direction of the route. (Top Picture)
Caldwell is a difficult street to cross, there is no marked
crosswalk, and there are no signs along Caldwell indicating that bicycles
may be present and crossing. (Bottom Picture) Adding the marked pedestrian
crosswalk and the bicycle warning signs would help. |
|
Curiously, although it’s only a few blocks south on Leader
to the next turn at Lansing, there is a “confidence” sign along this street.
This is in contrast with the lack of such a sign along Leoti, as mentioned
earlier. |
|
At Leader and Lansing these is a good example of a clear
and explicit sign. This is an example of good use of signs, with
signs for the turn in both directions. |
|
Continuing east on Lansing, there is another “confidence”
sign – however the trees and foliage along the street obscure the sign.
(Enlarge the picture, and you’ll find it.) |
|
A short distance down Lansing is the intersection with Clifford.
The sign indicates a right turn but you could just as well continue down
Lansing to Forest Glen Avenue. This does no harm, but an extra turn
is added. One block down Clifford is Las Casas Avenue requiring a
left turn. There is no sign for this, but none is really needed since
it’s the only way to go. |

|
The corner of Las Casas Avenue and Forest Glen Avenue
is well signed, from both directions. If you follow the arrow you’ll
continue eastbound towards the lakefront path. Another sign might be added
suggesting a right-turn, riding down Forest Glen Avenue to the stoplight
at Elston Avenue – and the bike lane to downtown Chicago. Las Casas
and Forest Glen would be a logical junction for this decision, and maybe
a sign or map of some sort should suggest this. |

|
Continuing eastbound on Forest Glen you come to a stoplight
at Cicero Avenue. Across the street is a sign indicating the direction
of travel,
and slightly beyond that is a sign indicating the right-turn
onto Kerchival. |
|
However, riding along Kerchival you come to an
intersection with Rogers and Kenton – and again the bike sign (as well
as the stop sign) is slightly obscured by the trees and foliage.
The turn is onto Kenton, and Kenton isn’t shown on the Chicago Bike Map
of Spring, 2001. |
|
At Kenton and Bryn Mawr, there is a sign that is completely
obscured by a tree. The tree also obscures the street name signs
and both signs are mounted on an existing light pole. It isn’t necessary
to trim the tree; simply move the bike sign to a freestanding sign behind
the guardrail. |
|
Along Bryn Mawr, the path crosses the railroad tracks.
There are several large obstacles to keep cars from crossing but it isn’t
clear that there is passage for pedestrians and cyclists, so a sign indicating
the direction of travel might be posted at this juncture as well. |
|
At the intersection of Bryn Mawr and Pulaski another
sign is posted some distance across the intersection and again partially
obscured by the trees. |
At this point, I quit. I don’t know for sure I could find the
lake navigating by, and depending on, the signs alone. There are
several options from Bryn Mawr and Pulaski to get to the lakefront path,
some more direct than others. The Chicago Bike Map, Spring 2001 suggests
several and in addition to those shown on the map there are other options,
more colorful and scenic, as well.
|
The signs themselves are much better than the plain-vanilla “Bike Route”
signs that give no further information and perhaps serve no purpose except
to inform motorists of the presence of bikes along the road. Two
suggestions to enhance the route signs: add the direction, “east”
or “west” to the arrow on each sign. Also, perhaps an additional
sign at a few points along the way with an overall view of the route from
end to end. |
Bob Kastigar
Sunday, 3 June 2002
Home Page
Bike Page