THEOLOGIANS AGAINST RELIGION


Gregory Holmes Singleton

Prior to 1945, Reinhold and H. Richard Niebuhr and Paul Tillich were known only to specialists in theology. Soren Kierkegaard was familiar only to a small handful of cognicenti. Calvinist theological categories dominated general theological discourse in the United States. Between 1945 and 1970, The Nieburhs and Tillich were household names, as was Kierkegaard. Lutheran theological categories challenged the Calvinist hegemony. The changes were part of a significant shift in Christian thought in the United States which challenged both the religious "establishment" and American culture generally. It was a reformation.

The work in progress is in part a study of a specific period and a specific problem in the history of theology. In part it is a study in American cultural history. In part it is an attempt to reclaim a theological agenda that, not long ago, was at the center of American culture and has rapidly become peripheral. Like all reformations, the one which occurred roughly between 1945 and 1970 was multifaceted, contained contradictory elements, both evidenced and addressed the larger cultural strains of which it was a part, and generated ideas radical enough to shake the religious foundations of one generation and to be politely (perhaps fearfully) ignored by the next. There is a common theme among the diverse voices of this reformation. Whether Catholic, Lutheran, Anglican, or Protestant; whether Neo-Orthodox or Evangelical, Sacramentalist or Pietist, Liberal or Conservative, these theologians and their fellow-travelers generally regarded religion as the culturally encrusted barrier to a more complete realization of the Law, the Gospel, and spirituality. My current writing reflects my occupation (and to some extent my vocation) as a professor of History. I hope to account forthe rapid and radical shift in religious thought in America following World War II. I also hope to suggest tensions within the larger culture illuminated by this shift. In the task of reclamation, which reflects my status as a concerned Christian, I hope to convince some of my fellow Christians to take this recent part of our heritage more seriously.

SOME BACKGROUND NOTES

I INVITE YOUR COMMENTS
GO BACK HOME