Semester: Fall 2000Description: This course introduces you to the history and to the major institutions, processes, group actors, and movements
Class Period: MWF 9:00-9:50 AM
Room: CLS 2020
Dr. Leaman's Office: CLS 2050
Office Hours: MWF 8:10-8:50 AM and 10:10-10:50 AM; W 5:30-7:00 PM; or by appointment.
Telephone: 773-794-2687
Website: www.neiu.edu/~dleaman
E-mail: d-leaman@neiu.edu
Learning Community: This course is one of three courses (the
other two being ACAD DEV 103: University Seminar and
ENGL 101: Writing I) that make up a new “learning community” called
“Identity, Community, and the Struggle for Meaningful
Democracy.” The purpose of this learning community is to increase
interaction and coordination among students and
professors so as to enhance overall learning. For example, we
hope that the study skills you work on in your University
Seminar will help you to better tackle assignments in American National
Government and that the issues of community, identity,
and struggle that you deal with in American National Government will
give you insight for your discussion and writing on those
general and related topics in Writing I. And so on. Also,
because the three courses in our learning community run
back-to-back in the same classroom, we expect that there will be a
few occasions where a special event (e.g. a guest speaker,
a video, or a field trip) will run for more than one class period and
a few days that we will switch the order of classes. In
addition, you will see that 25% of your final grade in all three classes
(10% for WebBoard writing and 15% for your final
paper) is the same for all three classes. This reduces your overall
workload in this learning community.
Course Requirements: In addition to the reading assignments listed
below, PSCI 216 features three written non-cumulative
exams, two essays (the second one will count for all three courses),
and a few short computer data assignments. Due dates are listed on
the course calendar. You should always expect to spend at least ten
hours per week working on this class (including class time). Any
changes in the schedule will be announced in advance. The penalty
for lateness on any assignment is one letter grade PER DAY of lateness.
In addition, perfect class attendance is required; more than four absences
and/or frequent
tardiness will result in a failing grade for the participation portion
of your course grade. If you have trouble keeping up with
course work, please come and talk with me! I want to help you
to succeed.
Textbooks: There are two textbooks to buy for this class. Please purchase them immediately.
Bruce Miroff, Raymond Seidelman, and Todd Swanstrom, The Democratic Debate: An Introduction to American Politics.Written Exams: Each of the three exams, consisting of short answer and short essay questions, will cover five chapters of theBarbara Kingsolver, Holding the Line: Women in the Great Arizona Mine Strike of 1983.
Essays: You are lucky to be taking American National Government
during a major election year! Essay #1 will engage you
with election year 2000 by asking you to focus on a specific candidate
who is campaigning for national office. After being
matched with a candidate early in the term, you will be expected to
research the political background, three distinctive policy
positions, and electoral prospects for your candidate. You will
then present your findings in a 3-4 page essay, typed and
double-spaced. Essay #2 will be your thoughtful and personal
response to Holding the Line (see the list of “questions to think
about” on the final page of this syllabus), Push, and other class readings
and discussions. Essay #2, which counts for all three
courses, will be typewritten, double-spaced, 5-7 pages, and will go
through a first draft and revised final draft..
WebBoard and Electronic Mailing List: One of the goals of this
course, and of this learning community, is to give you lots of opportunities
to write informally and to discuss course topics with each other.
To make that possible, we will all be subscribed to an electronic mailing
list and to a WebBoard. You will expected to check your e-mail regularly
for announcements and to participate in weekly small group interactive
discussions on the WebBoard that deal with course and learning community
topics. You will generally receive your question on Monday and
be expected to respond to it by Wednesday OR to your
WebBoard discussion mate responses by Friday. The WebBoard, your
weekly computer “journal”, can be accessed through
Professor Leaman’s home page: www.neiu.edu/~dleaman. Please go
there and subscribe right away.
Crosstabs Exercises: You will be expected to complete four Crosstab
computer data exercises to build your data analysis
skills and to broaden your understanding of American politics.
See the course calendar for specific assignments. More
information will be provided early in the term.
Grading: The various components of your grade have the “weights”
listed below. Your final grade is calculated according to
the standard percentages listed in the college catalogue (A = 90-100%;
B = 80-89%; C = 70-79%; D = 60-69%; F = Below
60%).
| Three written exams | 150 points (50 points each) | 37.5% |
| Essay #1 | 40 points | 10% |
| Essay #2* | 60 points | 15% |
| Crosstabs exercises | 40 points (10 points each) | 10% |
| WebBoard writing* | 40 points | 10% |
| Responses to Holding the Line | 30 points | 7.5% |
| Attendance/participation | 40 points | 10% |
| TOTAL | 400 points | 100% |
| *These assignments and grades are common to all three classes -- and will count for all three! |
POLITICS CLUB: Class members are invited to participate in Politics
Club activities. Such activities generally take place
every other Tuesday during the Activity Hour, 1:40-2:40 PM.
***************
COURSE CALENDAR
Week 1 The Declaration and the Constitution: Origins of
the Democratic Debate
August 28 and 30; September 1
READ: Miroff, et al., chapters 1 and 2
Week 2 Public Opinion and Political Culture
Labor Day holiday; September 6 and 8
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 3
Kingsolver, Introduction and pp.1-18Begin Essay #1 research on political candidate
Week 3 The American Political Economy
September 11, 13, and 15
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 4
Kingsolver, pp.18-48
Week 4 Voting, Non-Voting, and Elections
September 18, 20, and 22
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 5
Crosstabs exercise #1Exam #1 on September 29
Week 5 The Politics of Corporate Mass Media -- and
the Alternatives
September 25, 27, and 29
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 6
Kingsolver, pp.49-78
Week 6 Political Parties and Political Party Systems
October 2, 4, and 6
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 7
Kingsolver, pp.78-107
Week 7 Campaigns: Organized Money Versus Organized
People
October 9, 11, and 13
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 8
Crosstabs exercise #2
Week 8 Interest Groups and the Interest Group System
October 16, 18, and 20
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 9
Kingsolver, pp. 107-133Essay #1 due on October 27
Week 9 Popular Social Movements in American History
October 23, 25, and 27
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 10
Kingsolver, pp. 134-162Exam #2 on November 3
Week 10 Congress and Types of Representation
October 30; November 1 and 3
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 11
Crosstabs exercise #3
Week 11 The Presidency and Elite Democracy
November 6, 8, and 10
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 12
Kingsolver, pp. 163-196Field trip to prison on November 15
Essay #2 due on November 17 (Revised final draft due on December 1)
Week 12 Bureaucracy: Myths and Realities
November 13, 15, and 17
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 13
Crosstabs exercise #4
Week 13 The Supreme Court and the Judicial System
November 20 and 22; Thanksgiving holiday
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 14
Week 14 Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
November 27 and 29; December 1
READ: Miroff, et al., chapter 16
Week 15+ Summing Up: Identity, Community, and the Struggle
for Meaningful Democracy
December 4, 6, 8, and 11
READ: Finish up any missed readings and review for final exam(Final) Exam #3: Wednesday, December 13, 10:00-11:50 AM
APPENDIX: Questions to think about while reading Holding the Line, by Barbara Kingsolver
1. As text chapter 3 points out, American political culture is
one of the most individualistic anywhere. Yet we are also “a
country of joiners.” What does Kingsolver’s book tell us about
the differences between individual and collective identity and
action? What is the purpose and what are the advantages or disadvantages
of collective (“union”) action? Why did these
women believe in it so strongly?
2. Some social scientists have argued that women tend to have
different methods and goals than men when it comes to politics
and organizing. Do you agree? In this strike, why do you
think women took the lead? How would you describe their methods and
goals? How was their “holding the line” connected to their personal
lives and their personal empowerment?
3. Thinking about the debate between elite democracy and popular
democracy, what does this story suggest about the type
and quality of U.S. “democracy” in the following areas --
a. Protection of civil liberties? (see text chapter 16)4. As discussed in text chapter 2, the Framers (18th century republicans) elevated private property rights above other politicalb. Information from mass media? (see text chapter 6)
c. Treatment by law enforcement? (see text chapter 16)
d. Competition of political parties? (see text chapter 7 and Kingsolver, pp. 184-185)
5. As discussed in text chapters 4 and 8-10, one major battle
in interest group politics is the struggle between business
(employers) and labor (employees), between “organized money” and “organized
people”. What does this story suggest about
the relative powers of business and labor? What are the sources
of power of each group?
6. As discussed in text chapter 4, corporate globalization is
a major characteristic of our early 21st century world. How does
the story of this strike in Arizona relate to the theme of globalization?
How were these workers affected by the global economy and how did their
struggle become global (pp. 187-189)? Can labor unions control global
corporate power?
7. Was this strike about money? If not, what was it about?
Given the power of global corporations, do you think these
women were on a “fool’s mission”? Why or why not? What
rights do you think are worth fighting for? In the current
American political system and in our globalized economy, what do you
think are the best ways to protect or acquire those
rights?