
TO: Jean Hemzacek, Chair
Kate Forhan, Dean
College of Arts and Sciences
Roger Gilman, Associate Dean
College of Arts and Sciences
Laura Sanders, Program Head
Department of Chemistry, Earth Science and Physics
Pratibha Varma-Nelson, Chair
Department of Chemistry, Earth Science and Physics
FROM: Diane Stehman, Chair
Department of Economics Geography and Environmental Studies
DATE:
RE:
Challenge to the ESCI’s
proposed Environmental Geoscience major
Geography and Environmental Studies challenges the ESCI proposed New Program – Bachelor of Arts Degree in Environmental Geosciences. This challenge is based on program duplication, lack of necessary breadth, and failure to meet the goals of the program.
Ø
Program
Duplication. The proposed program
duplicates the current ESCI major and overlaps with the Environmental
Studies
major in Geography and Environmental Studies.
The proposed B.A. differs from the current ESCI B.S. mainly by replacing 25 hours in chemistry, math, and physics with either 5 hours of chemistry or 6 hours of biology and with ESCI electives being available from their current list of elective courses within the department. ESCI claims that no new courses are necessary for this program.
The ESCI proposal states that some of their students would like to study the environment more broadly, but still with a solid geological grounding. Students can already do this by taking an Environmental Studies major in the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies. Environmental Studies students who are especially interested in geology are encouraged to take a minor in ESCI and – with advisement – to satisfy some of the electives with other courses from the ESCI department. A review of the transcripts of Environmental Studies majors shows that most have declared a science minor. The transcripts also show that Environmental Studies students are taking science courses beyond their General Education requirements in departments other than their declared minor.
Ø
Program
lacks necessary breadth. The ESCI proposal requires 38 hours of
ESCI
courses and only one course from a science department outside of ESCI. This does not provide the necessary breadth
students will need to prepare them for the potential careers (business,
law,
journalism, politics, land planning and development, anthropology,
environmental medicine, library and information science, applied
information
technology, and international relations) referred to by the ESCI
proposal.
To give students’
knowledge of the
environment and working approaches to solutions of environmental
problems, a
multidisciplinary, problem-oriented major is needed.
This is the philosophy of the Environmental
Studies major in the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies
and
appears to be the philosophy of environmental programs at other
universities. This can be summed up in
the diagram below.

Environmental issues are generally very complex; they require an understanding of both the natural sciences and human/social environments. Local and international political structures, demographic forces, philosophies, cultures, and economic issues must be addressed along with the biological, atmospheric and geological ones. It is not possible to adequately prepare students to address complex issues – such as land use, water quality, waste disposal, pollution, economic growth, population pressure, resource depletion, and urbanization – from a predominantly geological perspective. The multidisciplinary Environmental Studies major provides an appropriate background for examining such complex issues.
Ø
Program
does not meet the stated goals.
The proposal states that this major will serve students who want to study Earth Science but “want to obtain a more liberal education in Geosciences with an emphasis on environmental issues.” This cannot be accomplished within a program that relies only on existing ESCI courses with just one or two required courses outside of ESCI. All environmental programs that we have examined, including the programs listed in the ESCI proposal, include many courses outside of ESCI to provide the student with the necessary tools to examine environmental issues.
In several of the performance criteria it is stated that a “Scientific paper OR paper/project applying principles of Environmental Geosciences to other discipline” is required as proof of stated goals. The proposal suggests that a single 300-level major course will suffice. A student will be ill-equipped to write a meaningful scientific paper without a thorough background developed through a coherent group of courses from the other discipline, as well as the proper grounding in mathematics and other sciences.
The proposed program will not be able to meet the performance criteria with a community service project without a multidisciplinary background. Without courses in a non-science discipline, students will be unable to apply geologic principles to successfully complete a community service project.
Goal 3 of the proposal states that “Students will obtain the knowledge and skills needed for good citizenship – especially the ability to make informed decisions about land-use, resources and the environment and to continue life-long learning about environmental geoscience-based issues.” Without taking any social science courses beyond General Education requirements, students will not be able to make informed decisions about land-use, the use of resources and the environment.
Statement 5 of the proposal claims that the proposed program will prepare students for multiple careers and life-long learning. The only evidence presented to support this claim is a quote about a program in Geology which includes cognate courses in math, chemistry, and physics, and not an environmental Geoscience curriculum that omits these. The proposal provides no evidence that the proposed degree will prepare students for multiple careers or life-long learning.
It is not possible for the ESCI program to
adequately address the large environmental issues claimed with just
currently
offered courses- or without a shift of mission which will duplicate an
important part of what Geography and Environmental Studies already
provides. The marriage between
Environmental Studies and Geography has worked well.
Geography is uniquely positioned between the
natural and social sciences and, like Environmental Studies, it
necessarily
integrates many fields. Where
Environmental Studies focuses on solving complex environmental
problems,
geography attempts to understand patterns of spatial distribution. Questions such as “where?,” “why there,”
“where next?” and “where should …?” require synthesis of parts of many
disciplines from the social and natural sciences. These
questions are the domain of geography,
and the geographers’ approach is invaluable to Environmental Studies. Both naturally and by design, many
“Geography” courses also appeal to “Environmental Studies” students,
and
vice-versa; indeed, the department’s combined M.A. (Geography and
Environmental
Studies) with 31 active students, is testament to the successful
marriage. Attached is a partial list
that shows that
our students are successfully working in diverse environmental careers.
The faculty of Geography and Environmental Studies would like to work more closely with ESCI to improve students’ preparedness for environmental careers. A second environmental B.A. is not the best way to utilize scarce university resources.
Northeastern
Geography and Environmental Studies
Elected Leadership
Cary
Park District (
Phil Stanko, Board member, former president
Planning and Management
Cook
County Forest
Preserve District (
Chet Ryndak, Conservation Supervisor
Kane
County Forest
Preserve District (
Drew Ullberg, Director of Planning
John DiFulvio, Area Manager
Lake
County Forest
Preserve District (
James Anderson, Natural Resource Manager
McHenry
County
Conservation District (
Ed Collins, Natural Resources Manager
Pat Howard, Restoration Technician
Jackie Batson, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Specialist
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Michael Martinez, Development and Acquisition Specialist
Will
County Forest Preserve District (
Marcella DeMauro, Director of Planning and Operations
Robyn Flakne, Natural Resource Manager
Interpretation and Education
Cook
County Forest Preserve District (
Irene
Flebbe, Interpretive Naturalist,
Nancy Halliday,
Interpretive
Naturalist,
Michelle
Goldberg Motlowitz, Interpretive
Naturalist, River Trail
DuPage
County Forest Preserve District (
Margie Martinson, Interpretive Naturalist
McHenry
County Conservation District (
Patricia Runkels Sebastion, Education Services
Kathleen Kelly, Interpretive Naturalist
City of
Ray Carrell, Director of Environment, O’Hare Airport
Nicole Kamins, Department of Environment
John Raffetto, Garfield Park Conservatory
David Clark, Research Department
Libby Hill, Associate Planner
Irene Hogstrom, Associate Planner
U. S. Department of Commerce
Adam Gibson, GIS Specialist, Federal Bureau of Fire Arms
George Azevedo, Water Program
Pauline Gambill, Public Affairs
Mick Hans, Media Relations
Megan Gavin, Environmental Education Specialist
Michael Gentleman, Water Resources
George Opek, Environmental Scientist
Karen Rodriguez
Dolly Tong
Jane Lilienfeld-Jones, Inspector General
Kris Lah, Endangered Species Coordinator
Chivia Horton
Earth Tech (Environmental Consulting)
Teri
Radke, Ecologist
Geoanalytics (Geographics Information Systems, etc.)
Peter Thumb, President
Huff and
Huff,
James Novak, Senior Environmental Scientist
Kowalenko & Bilotti, Inc. (Management, Engineering, and Environmental
Consultants)
Tony Bilotti, Vice President and Technical Services Director
Carolyn Cullen, Researcher
Natural Areas Ecosystem Management
Randy Stowe, President
Karen Downing Stowe, Vice President
Paramatrix, environmental consulting firm, Seattle
Pat Togher, Researcher
Red
Jack Kaskel, Owner
Dan Bell
Wight Consulting
Paul Jahn, GIS/FieldCoordinator
Witness Tree Native Landscapes
Mary Zaander, Co-Owner
Tina Riley, Guest Services Manager
Susanne Masi, Research Botanist
Joan O’Shaughnessy, Ecologist
Quaker
Earthcare Witness (Headquarters in
Alice Howenstine, Member of Steering Committee
Friends of
the
Chris Parson, Manager of Education and Stewardship Programs
Alice Howenstine, Member of Board of Directors and Manager
of
Barbara Day, Board Member
National Geographic
Society,
Janice Wolf, Senior Researcher, National Geographic Channels
International
Nature Conservancy (
Laurel Ross, Director of Conservation Programs
Cynthia Vasquez, Supervisor of Volunteer Programs
Prairie Club, (Chicago)
Land Conservancy of
Linda Balek, Land Protection Specialist
Motorola Corporation
Kregg Salvino, Environmental Safety and Health Manager
Weyerhaeuser Lumber
David Wing, Recycling Education
Standard
Parking Corporation,
James A. Wilhelm, President and CEO
John Schroeder, Chairman, Geography Department
Jack Giles, Chairman, Dept. of Social Studies
David Rodgers, Faculty, Environmental Science
Northeastern
Libby
Hill, adjunct faculty
Mexican
Office of
David Salazar, Associate
Toledo Institute for Development and the Environment (TIDE),
Wil Maheia, Executive Director
Richard Carter. Cabin Fever, Dialogues with
Nature.
1995.
Andrea
Jauck (with
___________.
Libby
Hill. The
Press, August 2000.
Susanne Masi (with
Thomas
M.Antonio). The Sunflower Family in
the Upper
Nancy Halliday, artist for Mammals of North America (Princeton Field Guides)
by Roland W. Kays and Don E. Wilson,
Press. 2002.
* Almost all of these students graduated with a degree in Geography, Environmental Studies or an M.A. in G&ES. A few are current students nearing completion. Several did not complete their degrees, but associate themselves with the department anyway.
Department
of Geography and Environmental Studies
Northeastern
Illinois University
© 2005 Earth Science Department,
Northeastern
Illinois University.
Last updated April 15, 2005.