|
|
Exceeds Standards |
Meets Standards |
Fails to Meet
Standards |
|
Problem
Statements
-How many
problems? -Are the problems substantial?
|
Identifies more
than one specific, substantial problem faced by the company.
|
Identifies one
specific, substantial problem faced by the company.
|
Problems
identified are not defined in specific enough terms or not
substantial enough.
|
|
Problem
Analysis
-More than
one? -At least one
analysis tool? -Financial
analysis? |
Analysis
includes all of the following: - More than one stated problems is analyzed thoughtfully
- At
least 1 analysis tool is correctly applied
-
Relevant financial analysis is correctly applied if applicable
(Financial ratios or other financial analysis approach) |
Analysis
includes 2 of the following:
-
1
problem is analyzed thoughtfully OR 2 problems are covered
superficially.
- At
least 1 analysis tool is correctly applied. |
Problem analysis
is vague or nonexistent, and analysis tools are incorrectly
applied. |
|
Identification of Alternatives
- How many
alternatives? - Do
alternatives clearly address problems?
|
Identifies a
comprehensive set of 3 or more thoughtful alternatives,
excluding “Do Nothing” alternatives. Alternatives address all
relevant aspects of the stated problems.
|
Identifies 2
alternatives, excluding "Do Nothing" alternatives. Alternatives
address most relevant aspects of the stated problems.
|
Identifies one
or no alternatives other than a "Do Nothing" alternative.
Alternatives do not clearly address stated problem.
|
|
Evaluation of
Alternatives
- Are
alternatives based on prior analyses? - How
convincing and comprehensive are the arguments provided?
|
Alternatives are
evaluated based on prior analyses. Arguments are convincing and
comprehensive.
|
Alternatives are
evaluated based on prior analyses. The arguments are largely
convincing but maybe not comprehensive.
|
Alternatives are
not clearly related to prior analyses. Arguments are not
convincing and/or not comprehensive.
|
|
Alternative
Selection and Implementation
- Is an
alternative selected? - Is selection
justified with pros and cons? - Does
implementation plan include actions and timelines? |
One alternative
is selected, and the selection is justified with a clear set of
pros and cons. Implementation plan includes specific actions
and timelines.
|
One alternative
is selected, and the selection is justified, although it misses
a few pros and/or cons. Implementation plan includes actions and
timelines.
|
Either no
alternative is selected, or the selected alternative is not
justified. Implementation plan is unspecific or does not exist.
|