Peer Evaluation of Teamwork Rubric
  Outstanding
(4 points)

Good
(3 points)

 Marginal
(2 points)		 Poor
(0-1 points)

1.    Attending group meetings on time
(Attendance, punctuality, announced misses)

 Always there and on time; maybe one or two announced misses Missed or was late for 2 or 3 meetings; misses were announced ahead of time Missed and/or was late for more than 3  meetings… mostly un-announced Missed most of the meetings

2.   Attitude towards the project
(Interest in discussion & encouragement of others)
Always interested and encouraging
 Was generally interested and some-times encouraged others Seemed sometimes distracted and hardly ever encouraged others Was often disinterested and never encouraged others

3.   Listening to others when working in in the team.
(Paying attention & incorporating others’ thoughts)
Always paid attention to and incorporated what others said
 Always paid attention and sometimes incorporated what others said Paid attention more often than not, but rarely incorporated what others said Paid little attention and never incorporated what others said

4.   Willingness to cooperate with others
(Making suggestions, asking questions, drawing others in)

 Frequently made suggestions, asked questions, and drew others into discussion Made frequent suggestions and asked questions, but was less adapt at drawing others in Occasionally  made suggestions or asked questions, but rarely drew others in Largely quiet and passive; rarely made any suggestions or asked a question; and never drew others in

5.   Responding to emails/calls in a timely manner
(Substantive responses made in a prompt fashion)


 Always responded promptly & with substance to e-requests Usually responded promptly, but the quality of the responses varied Responses were sometimes late, and their substance was usually poor Frequently failed to respond at all; substance was always poor

6.    Solving team conflicts
(Verbalizing issues, proposing suggestions, contributing to solutions)

 Verbalized issues, made suggestions & contributed to solutions Verbalized issues, made suggestions & sometimes contributed to solutions Verbalized issues & maybe suggestions, but rarely contributed to solutions Complained about issues but made no constructive suggestions or contributions

7.    Quality of submitted work by the group member
(Well thought-out and/or researched)
Submitted work was well thought-out
Submitted work was acceptable Work showed significant flaws Most of the work had to be re-done

Back to Assessment Home

Peer Evaluation Rubric Worksheet
Using the following scale and the attached instructions and criteria, please evaluate EVERY group member (including yourself in the first column) on each of the areas listed

Outstanding
4

Good
3

Marginal
2

Poor
0-1
 
Names of Team Members

(Your Name)

{You Do
Grade Yourself}

          

1.    Attending group meetings on time
Attendance, punctuality, announced misses

          

2.   Attitude towards the project
Interest in discussion & encouragement of others

          

3.   Listening to others when working in groups.
Paying attention & incorporating others’ thoughts

          

4.   Willingness to cooperate with others
Making suggestions, asking questions, drawing others in

          

5.   Responding to emails/calls in a timely manner
Substantive responses made in a prompt fashion


          

6.    Contribution in solving project problems
Verbalizing issues, proposing suggestions, contributing to solutions

          

7.    Quality of submitted work
Well thought-out and/or researched

          

Total Points

(Add points in each column and enter Total Points for each member of the group) 		         

Comments: (Use reverse side if needed)

 

 

 		          
 

Click here for printable version 

 Signature

 
 

Back to Assessment Home