The scoring can be simplified when many student postings have to be evaluated.
  In that case, each criterion may only be rated on a “plus” or “minus” (0 or 1) basis.

Criteria/p>

Poor/Missing (0-1 point)

Good (2 points)

Exemplary (3 points)

Original Postings

Makes reference to the readings

No or vague reference made to readings

Readings mentioned once clearly

Readings mentioned clearly and prominently more than once

Relates new content to prior knowledge (work experience, prior coursework, readings, etc.)

(Virtually) no reference is made to prior knowledge

Obvious connection between prior knowledge and new content is made

Thoughtfully provides and integrates into discussion the connection between new content and prior knowledge

Critically analyzes the content – not just a summary of the readings

No analysis beyond a mere summary of the readings

Brief analysis that goes beyond a summary of the readings

Critical analysis supported with factual evidence or theory

Responses to Other Student Postings

Makes reference to other postings

No incorporation of ideas from other postings

Previous posting/s mentioned once explicitly

Thoughtful incorporation of ideas from other postings

Reply is logically reasoned and supported

Provides merely subjective statement/opinion with little or no thought

Logically reasoned, but not supported by specific evidence

Logically reasoned arguments that are supported with factual evidence or theory

All postings

Grammar and spelling are correct

Frequent grammar and/or spelling mistakes make comprehension difficult

A few grammar and/or spelling mistakes do not interfere with comprehension

No grammar and spelling mistakes

Postings are evenly distributed during the discussion period

No postings or posts comments on one day

Posts comments two days

Post comments three or more days

Total Scores:

GRAND TOTAL:

Lowest-possible score is 0, highest is 21.  Eighty percent (i.e. 16 points) of the maximum score constitutes mastery level.